vurmentor.blogg.se - Quicktime video codecs for adobe premiere pro

Hardware Encoding do always look worse than Software Encoding.

Maximum Bit Depth and Maximum Render Quality do not create the best quality in all situations.

I would skip Maximum Bit Depth and Maximum Render Quality and switch the Hardware Encoding to Software Encoding and lastly under Advanced Settings change the Key Frame Distance from 72 to 60 or even 30. The test footage in question is 359MB for a 50 second video (mp4) recorded at 60,000kbps in 1440p. I want to keep that data on the road as much as possible please.Īlso adding the test footage so you can download and try for yourself until some conclusion is made. The most noticeable areas are around the pavement, either in front of the vehicle or shadows near the rear bumper. I've attached the current export setup that I'm using and you'll notice certain areas was lost in the export as well. I've attempted a few different codecs like Quicktime + ProRes422/ProRes4444 and those bloated my test file towards 4-5GB's compared to the raw 359MB file.Īt this moment, I keep going back to H.264 because so many Youtubers use this for rendering video game footage and there's got to be a better way.

It's like I lost data and a lot of sharpness. I've been wanting to chop up my raw video files that I've recorded to be reused in future Youtube videos, but most exports seem slightly blurry when you compare them to raw footage.

Is that even possible? Like keeping it around the same filesize as the original file? The problem at hand is attempting to retain lossless quality while not bloating my filesizes to the moon. Hello, my name is DJ and I've ran into an issue that many people face when it comes to exporting videos.